Raymond Dobard v. City of Berkeley, M. Daugherty, Dash Butler, Lorraine Box and Mark Box

967 F.2d 585 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Raymond DOBARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF BERKELEY, M. Daugherty, Dash Butler, Lorraine Box and Mark Box, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-15550. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 10, 1992. * Decided June 19, 1992. Before ALARCON, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Raymond Dobard appeals from the judgment entered after his action was tried without a jury. The district court denied relief on Dobard's claims that the defendants deprived him of his civil rights and intentionally inflicted emotional distress because it determined that Dobard had not demonstrated that he suffered a cognizable injury. Dobard asserts the following grounds for error: (1) the district court coerced Dobard to waive a jury trial; (2) the factual findings supporting the district court's conclusion that no excessive force had been used were clearly erroneous; (3) the district…