Mario Flores, A/K/A Marior Flores v. James Rowland

967 F.2d 585 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mario FLORES, a/k/a Marior Flores, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James ROWLAND, et al. Respondent-Appellee. No. 91-16636. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 25, 1992. * Decided June 30, 1992. Before FLETCHER, LEAVY and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Mario Flores, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition. In his habeas petition, Flores challenges the loss of 90 days of worktime credits and the loss of the ability to earn worktime credits on a one credit for one day worked basis. We review de novo, Norris v. Risley, 878 F.2d 1178, 1180 (9th Cir.1989), and we affirm. 3 On October 17, 1989, Flores was involved in a fight with another inmate. He pleaded guilty to the charge of force and violence at a prison disciplinary hearing and lost 90 days of accumulated worktime credits which he had earned…