Roger Lee Clark Gayle E. Bradfield v. Lassen County Justice Court

Good Law
967 F.2d 585·1992 WL 152996·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 23990
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 6, 199291-35939California533 words

Opinion

Opinion

967 F.2d 585 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Roger Lee CLARK; Gayle E. Bradfield, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LASSEN COUNTY JUSTICE COURT, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-35939. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 24, 1992. * Decided July 6, 1992. Before FLETCHER, LEAVY and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Roger L. Clark and Gayle E. Bradfield appeal pro se the district court's dismissal of their civil rights complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (d). 1 Plaintiffs contend that they were denied due process and equal protection by a state judge and the Lassen County Justice Court because they were required either to forfeit bail or appear in person on a traffic citation. The district court adopted the findings and recommendation of the magistrate judge and concluded that plaintiffs asserted no basis for the court to find that defendants had violated their due process rights, and asserted no grounds for the court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.