Leroy W. Earp v. R. Harris, Isolation and Segregation Law Library and Property Officer of the Oregon State Penitentiary

967 F.2d 585 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Leroy W. EARP, Appellant, v. R. HARRIS, Isolation and segregation law library and property officer of the Oregon State Penitentiary, Appellee. No. 91-35589. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 15, 1992. * Decided July 10, 1992. Before KILKENNY, GOODWIN and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Earp appeals pro se from the district court's entry of summary judgment in favor of the defendant in this civil rights action. Earp contends that the district court erred by holding that he had not been deprived of his property without due process, by ruling that he had not been denied access to the courts, by failing to file and consider his second amended complaint, and by denying his request for appointment of counsel. We reject these arguments and affirm. 3 With respect to Earp's first contention, the allegations and evidence presented indicate at most that the defendant's actions, though…