Giles v. Hotel Oakland Associates

Good Law
967 F.2d 586·1992 WL 132888·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 24007
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 15, 199291-15952California184 words

Opinion

Opinion

967 F.2d 586 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Alan W. GILES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOTEL OAKLAND ASSOCIATES, a Massachusetts Limited Partnership; Hotel Oakland Corp, a General Partner, a Massachusetts Corporation; Denis A Blackett, a Massachusetts Resident; H.I.I Corp, a Massachusetts Corporation; TSI Management SVC, a Massachusetts Corporation; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Defendant-Appellees. No. 91-15952. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 11, 1992. * Decided June 15, 1992. Before ALARCON, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 For the reasons stated in the district court's opinion dated March 8, 1991, we AFFIRM. * The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Fed.R.App.P. 34(a) and 9th Cir.R. 34.4 ** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.