Rolando Garcilazo-Mejia v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service

967 F.2d 586 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Rolando GARCILAZO-MEJIA, Petitioner, v. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 91-70191. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 10, 1992. * Decided July 6, 1992. Before CHOY, SNEED and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Rolando Garcilazo-Mejia, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") decision. The BIA dismissed his appeal from an Immigration Judge's ("IJ") order denying his application for discretionary waiver of deportation. Garcilazo-Mejia contends that his due process right to fair administrative review was violated because part of the hearing before the IJ was not recorded due to an equipment malfunction. He also contends that the IJ violated his due process and statutory rights to a fair hearing by unfairly summarizing the unrecorded testimony. We reject these contentions and deny the petition.…