Kapust v. Bluebird Systems, Inc.

967 F.2d 587 1992 Copr.L.Dec. P 26,933 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Sheri KAPUST, an individual Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BLUEBIRD SYSTEMS, INC., a corporation; Budget Rent-A-Car of Southern California, a partnership d/b/a Budget Rent-A-Car of Beverly Hills, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-55445. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 19, 1992. Decided June 19, 1992. Before CANBY, REINHARDT and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Shirley Kapust appeals the grant of summary judgment on her copyright infringement claims. Our review of this decision is de novo. T.W. Elec. Serv., Inc. v. Pacific Elec. Contractors Ass'n, 809 F.2d 626 , 629 (9th Cir.1987). Because Kapust has settled her claim against Bluebird Systems, Inc., we need only consider her claim against Budget Rent-a-Car of Southern California. DISCUSSION 3 Even if it is assumed that Kapust had ownership rights in the Auto Rental System, she still cannot…