Eugene J. Hutch v. City and County of Honolulu

967 F.2d 587 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Eugene J. HUTCH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, et al. Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-15702. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 12, 1992. * Decided June 19, 1992. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and BEEZER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Eugene J. Hutch filed a pro se complaint against the City and County of Honolulu alleging violations of 28 U.S.C. § 1983 . The district court adopted the findings and recommendations of the magistrate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1) and dismissed the case. 3 The complaint alleges facts which Hutch claims constitute civil rights violations: 4 1. The failure of City of Honolulu Police Officers to render medical aid to plaintiff when he was assaulted by Terry Lee. 5 2. The failure of Honolulu Police Officers to follow up with an investigation of the alleged assault. 6 3. The deliberate indifference of the City of Honolulu in…