Aubrey Andrew Jhingory v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

967 F.2d 587 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Aubrey Andrew JHINGORY, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 91-70249. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 8, 1992. * Decided June 12, 1992. Before ALARCON, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Aubrey Andrew Jhingory ("Jhingory") petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") that summarily dismissed as frivolous his pro se appeal from an immigration judge's ("IJ") denial of discretionary relief from deportation under section 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA"), 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (c). Jhingory raises three issues in this appeal: 3 One. The IJ failed to instruct him to seek legal advice. 4 Two. The IJ failed to provide him with an adequate opportunity to confer with his father, prior to the deportation hearing. 5 Three. The IJ failed to consider certain hardships which he…