Interstate Production Credit Ass'n v. Baker

967 F.2d 587 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. INTERSTATE PRODUCTION CREDIT ASSOCIATION, a federal instrumentality, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald D. BAKER, Defendant-Appellant. and Federal Land Bank of Spokane, a corporation; United States of America, acting through the Small Business Administration; Defendants, Federal Intermediate Credit Bank of Spokane, Washington, a federal corporation, Counter-Defendant. No. 91-35226. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 4, 1992. * Decided June 8, 1992. Before EUGENE A. WRIGHT, CANBY and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 * Baker raises several issues for the first time on appeal. He insists that the 1985 loan agreement allowed him to defer repayment if the crops were less than expected. He also contends that the agreement was more than just an agreement to loan a certain sum of money. He says that it also obligated the Production Credit Association to provide additional financing in the…