Mark Larue v. James Blodgett, Superintendent Ronald Van Boening

967 F.2d 587 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mark LARUE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James BLODGETT, Superintendent, et al.; Ronald Van Boening, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-35704. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 10, 1992. * Decided June 19, 1992. Before FLETCHER, LEAVY and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Mark LaRue, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. In his action, LaRue claimed that his constitutional right of access to the courts was violated because he did not have access to an adequate law library, his correspondence with other inmates regarding legal matters was intercepted, and he was not permitted to store his personal property in his cell. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th…