Lawrence S. Krain, M.D. v. Robert Devich Vaino Spencer, Justice United States of America Herman Romm, M.D.

967 F.2d 587 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Lawrence S. KRAIN, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert DEVICH; Vaino Spencer, Justice; United States of America, et al.; Herman Romm, M.D., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-15758. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 26, 1992. * Decided June 4, 1992. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; No. CV-90-03555-SC, Samuel Conti, District Judge, Presiding. Before FARRIS, DAVID R. THOMPSON and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Lawrence S. Krain, M.D., appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his civil rights action for improper venue. In his complaint, Krain named three United States Supreme Court justices, a psychiatrist who treated him when he was confined at the Brea Neuropsychiatric Center, and two justices from the California Court of Appeal. In his complaint, Krain alleges that (1) the defendants violated his constitutional rights…