Clifford J. Johnson v. White Merrill Strankman, and the Bank of America, Real-Party-In-Interest

967 F.2d 587 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Clifford J. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WHITE; Merrill; Strankman, Defendants-Appellees, and The BANK OF AMERICA, Real-Party-in-Interest. No. 91-16626. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 8, 1992. * Decided July 10, 1992. Before POOLE, BEEZER and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Clifford J. Johnson appeals pro se the district court's sua sponte dismissal of his action seeking judicial review of a prior state court proceeding which Johnson alleged violated his constitutional rights under the fourteenth amendment. The district court dismissed the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, Peter Starr Prod. Co. v. Twin Continental Films, Inc., 783 F.2d 1440, 1442 (9th Cir.1986), and affirm. 1 3 The United States district courts have subject matter jurisdiction over general challenges to rules…