Loren R. Lusero v. James Rowland, Director, California State Department of Corrections

Good Law
967 F.2d 588·1992 WL 144464·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 24151
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 26, 199291-16122California671 words

Opinion

Opinion

967 F.2d 588 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Loren R. LUSERO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James ROWLAND, Director, California State Department of Corrections, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-16122. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 23, 1992. * Decided June 26, 1992. Before FLETCHER, LEAVY and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Loren R. Lusero appeals pro se the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against California state prison officials. 1 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Although Lusero raised several claims in the district court, the only claim he raises on appeal is his claim that prison medical personnel failed to diagnose him before prescribing antibiotics for a venereal disease. 2 Lusero claims that he was denied medical treatment by a doctor, and complains that his treatment by antibiotics was interrupted when the pharmacy ran out of his medication. He…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.