Windyceslau D. Lorenzo v. William W. Paty

967 F.2d 588 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Windyceslau D. LORENZO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William W. PATY, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-16196. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 24, 1992. * Decided June 29, 1992. Before FLETCHER, LEAVY and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Windyceslau D. Lorenzo appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in his action alleging denial of due process in connection with his eviction from a parcel of land by defendant state employees. The district court found that Lorenzo's claims against defendants in their official capacities were barred by eleventh amendment immunity, Lorenzo's claims for damages against defendants in their individual capacities were barred by qualified immunity, and Lorenzo's due process rights were not violated because he had no property interest in the land. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 3 We review de novo…