O'Rourke v. Maxwell Laboratories

967 F.2d 589 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Albert O. O'ROURKE; Raymond C. O'Rourke; Rorack, (Raymond C. O'Rourke and Alan C. Kolb); Raymond O'Rourke, and Raymond O'Rourke Associates, (Computrad, Inc., Lattice Electromagnetics, Inc., Yacht Charters Limited, Inc.), Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MAXWELL LABORATORIES, a Delaware Corporation; Karl Samuelian; S-Cubed, a Division of Maxwell Laboratories, Inc.; Frank Clark; Parker, Milliken, Clark, O'Hara and Samuelian, a California Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 90-56296. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 23, 1992. * Decided June 26, 1992. Before FLETCHER, LEAVY and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Plaintiffs appeal from the district court's denial of their motion for an extension of time in which to file a notice of appeal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 3 Under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5), "[t]he district court,…