Michael Wayne Reshard v. United States of America, Michael Wayne Reshard v. United States

967 F.2d 590 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Michael Wayne RESHARD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. Michael Wayne RESHARD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. Nos. 91-55573, 91-55576. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 25, 1992. * Decided July 6, 1992. Before POOLE, DAVID R. THOMPSON and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Petitioner Michael Wayne Reshard appeals the district court's denial of his consolidated motions for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 . 1 He argues that: (1) he was illegally sentenced after the revocation of his supervised release; (2) the trial court improperly considered false information in imposing his sentence; (3) his attorney failed to provide him with effective assistance; (4) he was denied his right to allocution; and (5) he was improperly denied an evidentiary hearing on his claims. We have…