Asmar H. Saleem, A/K/A Clarence E. Jones v. Manfred Maass, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary

967 F.2d 590 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Asmar H. SALEEM, a/k/a Clarence E. Jones, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Manfred MAASS, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellee. No. 91-35996. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 10, 1992. * Decided July 6, 1992. Before FLETCHER, LEAVY and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Asmar H. Saleem appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action against prison superintendent Manfred Maass. Saleem contends that he was denied due process when he was sanctioned, following a prison disciplinary hearing, for destroying a plastic spoon. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo a district court's grant of summary judgment. Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 110 S.Ct. 3217 (1990). We will affirm if, viewing…