Cecilia Osbun Rodriguez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

967 F.2d 590 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Cecilia Osbun RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 91-70226. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 4, 1992. Decided May 29, 1992. Before ALARCON, WILLIAM A. NORRIS and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Cecilia Osbun Rodriguez (Rodriguez) petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying her request for withholding of deportation and political asylum. She contends that the evidence she presented at her deportation hearing fulfilled the clear probability and well-founded fear of persecution standards required for relief under sections 208(a) and 243(h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. §§ 1158 (a), 1253(h). We disagree and affirm. I. 3 In support of her request for asylum and withholding of deportation, Rodriguez attempted to demonstrate that her life and freedom would be…