Ridgway By and Through Ridgway v. Cordes

967 F.2d 590 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. William R.T. RIDGWAY, By and Through his father and next friend, David RIDGWAY; David Ridgway, individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Clifford F. CORDES, III; Janice Boden; Carol Fuller; Nancy Swenson; Kathleen S. Mayers; Michael R. Parker, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-35541. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 26, 1992. * Decided June 2, 1992. Before FARRIS, DAVID R. THOMPSON and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 David Ridgway appeals pro se the district court's partial dismissal for failure to state a claim and partial summary judgment in his civil rights action. Ridgway alleged that defendants deprived him of his constitutional rights under the fifth and fourteenth amendments by conspiring to deny him custody of and visitation with his minor son, William Ridgway. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292 . We review de novo, Kruso v. International Tel.…