Walter Ruskin, by His Guardian Ad Litem, Donald Ruskin v. California Interscholastic Federation, Southern-Section

Good Law
967 F.2d 590·1992 WL 129321·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 24425
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 4, 199291-55351California537 words

Opinion

Opinion

967 F.2d 590 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Walter RUSKIN, By his Guardian Ad Litem, Donald RUSKIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA INTERSCHOLASTIC FEDERATION, SOUTHERN-SECTION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-55351. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 26, 1992. * Decided June 4, 1992. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; No. CV-89-0807-GLT, Gary L. Taylor, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before: FARRIS, DAVID R. THOMPSON and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Walter Ruskin, by his guardian ad litem, Donald Ruskin, appeals the district court's summary judgment in favor of the defendant, California Interscholastic Federation in Ruskin's action brought under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985. We review de novo the district court's grant of summary judgment. Taylor v. List, 880 F.2d 1040, 1044 (9th Cir.1989). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.