Jullian Swig v. Officer Jones 66 Officer Dillard 23, Hustead's Inc. G.A. Beckford Del Pierce Regents of University of California at Berkeley Does 1-50

967 F.2d 591 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jullian SWIG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OFFICER JONES # 66; Officer Dillard # 23, Hustead's Inc.; G.A. Beckford; Del Pierce; Regents of University of California at Berkeley; Does 1-50, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-15724. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 8, 1992. * Decided June 22, 1992. Before CHAMBERS, SCHROEDER and BEEZER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jullian Swig sued in the district court alleging civil rights and other violations in connection with the towing and impounding of his 1986 Toyota van. Swig's complaint contends that the van's seizure was improper because there has never been any definitive determination that the van is subject to registration. In Swig v. Department of Motor Vehicles, mem. op. No. 89-15739 (9th Cir.1991) (Swig I ), however, we affirmed the district court's determination in another lawsuit instigated by Swig that California has "the right to require…