Snohomish County Public Utility Dist. No. 1 v. Bonneville Power Admin.

Good Law
967 F.2d 591·1992 WL 133002·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 24171
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 15, 199290-70257California1,182 words

Opinion

Opinion

967 F.2d 591 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. SNOHOMISH COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1, Petitioner, Puget Sound Power & Light Co., Petitioner-Intervenor, v. BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION, Respondent, and Portland General Electric Co., et al., Respondent-Intervenor. No. 90-70257. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 6, 1992. Decided June 15, 1992. 1 Before PREGERSON and TROTT, Circuit Judges, and DIMMICK, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 This case involves a challenge to a settlement reached between parties involved in the construction of Nuclear Project Number 1 ("WNP-1"). On February 6, 1973, five investor-owned utilities ("IOUs"), the Bonneville Power Association (the "BPA"), and the Washington Public Power Supply System ("WPPSS"), entered into exchange agreements relating to the construction of WNP-1. Each IOU purchased a share of WNP-1 and assigned its share to the BPA in return for a share of the BPA's…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.