Sternberg v. Debuys

967 F.2d 591 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Sandra STERNBERG, Plaintiff-Counter-defendant-Appellant, v. Mabry C. DEBUYS; Short & Cressman, a partnership; Paul R. Cressman; Jane Doe Cressman, husband and wife and the marital community composed thereof; John O. Burgess; Jane Doe Burgess, husband and wife and the marital community composed thereof; Douglas R. Hartwich; Jane Doe Hartwich, husband and wife and the marital community composed thereof, et al Defendants-Counter-plaintiffs-Appellees. No. 91-35207. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 2, 1992. Decided June 15, 1992. Before EUGENE A. WRIGHT, CANBY and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Sandra Sternberg appeals from the district court's judgment for Mabry DeBuys on Count IV of Sternberg's complaint alleging legal malpractice. We affirm. DISCUSSION Standard of Review 3 This court ordinarily reviews a finding of proximate cause for clear error. Bunting v.…