United States v. Michael Anthony Campbell

967 F.2d 592 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Anthony CAMPBELL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50707. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 25, 1992. * Decided July 6, 1992. Before FLETCHER, LEAVY and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Michael Anthony Campbell appeals from his sentence, imposed following a guilty plea, for one count of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a). Campbell contends that the district court erred by relying on three unindicted bank robberies when choosing the point at which to sentence him within the applicable range under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm. 3 We review for clear error findings of fact underlying a sentence determination. United States v. Burns, 894 F.2d 334, 336 (9th Cir.1990). 1 4 The district court may consider any information relevant to…