United States v. Emilio Arrellano-Soto, Abel Rodriguez-Mata, Julio Alfonso Alvarez-Garcia, and Ana Medina Carrillo

Good Law
967 F.2d 592·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 24198
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 10, 199291-50488California3,713 words

Opinion

Opinion

967 F.2d 592 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Emilio ARRELLANO-SOTO, Abel Rodriguez-Mata, Julio Alfonso Alvarez-Garcia, and Ana Medina Carrillo, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 91-50488, 91-50489, 91-50516 and 91-50519. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 6, 1992. Decided June 10, 1992. Before ALARCON, WILLIAM A. NORRIS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Emilio Arrellano-Soto (Arrellano), Abel Rodriguez-Mata (Rodriguez), Ana Medina-Carrillo (Medina), and Julio Alfonso Alvarez-Garcia (Alvarez) were indicted for conspiracy to distribute and distribution of heroin and cocaine. Arrellano and Rodriguez appeal from the sentences imposed after they pleaded guilty to distributing heroin on October 26, 1990 in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 , as charged in superseding informations. Medina and Alvarez appeal from the judgment entered after…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.