United States v. Linda Bohlke, United States of America v. Cora Miller, United States of America v. Shirley Pevarnik

Good Law
967 F.2d 592·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 24205
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 19, 199291-10465California383 words

Opinion

Opinion

967 F.2d 592 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Linda BOHLKE, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cora MILLER, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shirley PEVARNIK, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 91-10465, 91-10504, and 91-10505. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 10, 1991. * Decided June 19, 1992. Before FLETCHER, LEAVY and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In these consolidated cases, Linda Bohlke, Cora Miller, and Shirley Pevarnik appeal from their sentences, following a bench trial, for unreasonable obstruction of federal property in violation of 40 U.S.C. §§ 318a and 318c and 41 C.F.R. § 101-20.305 . Appellants contend that the district court erred by considering impermissible evidence before sentencing them. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm. 3 Appellants and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.