United States v. Jesus Armando Gonzalez, Jr.
Opinion
Opinion
967 F.2d 593 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus Armando GONZALEZ, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-10311. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 12, 1992. * Decided June 17, 1992. Before JAMES R. BROWNING, ALDISERT ** and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 Gonzalez argues the district court abused its discretion in refusing to grant his motion to exclude the first two minutes of a videotape shown at trial. Apparently by mistake, the government had left off the first two minutes of the tape when it gave Gonzalez a copy of the tape pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(a)(1)(C). 3 The tape was made after a border patrol agent became suspicious when the same car drove up to the border for the second time in about 20 minutes. The first two minutes showed an unidentifiable individual driving up to the border, getting out of the car, and walking toward the border.…