United States v. Jane Doe

967 F.2d 593 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jane DOE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-10260. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 14, 1992. Decided June 19, 1992. Before HUG, TANG and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Jane Doe, a minor, was convicted of aiding and abetting her brother's possession with intent to distribute less than 100 grams of heroin. Doe appeals her conviction. We affirm. I. Sufficiency of the Evidence 3 Doe argues that the government failed to prove that she had the specific intent to facilitate the commission of a crime by her brother. We disagree. The evidence showed that, at her brother's instruction, Doe went into the bedroom closet, took out a heroin sample, and handed it to her brother. On her own initiative, Doe then closed the curtains and locked the front door. Doe watched from nearby while an undercover officer and her brother…