United States v. Brian K. Entendencia

967 F.2d 593 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brian K. ENTENDENCIA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-15703. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 5, 1992. * Decided June 16, 1992. Before CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, BRUNETTI, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Brian Entendencia ("Entendencia" or "appellant") appeals pro se from the district court's denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 . Entendencia argued before the district court that (1) his trial counsel had been ineffective, (2) he should have received a 2-point reduction in his offense level for acceptance of responsibility, and (3) his guilty plea was rendered involuntary because the government misled him by not explaining at the time it accepted the plea that the appellant could be sentenced as a career offender under the Sentencing Guidelines. We reject these contentions and…