United States v. Teodulo Hernandez-Alvarado

967 F.2d 593 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Teodulo HERNANDEZ-ALVARADO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-10207. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 10, 1992. * Decided June 18, 1992. 1 Before FLETCHER, LEAVY and T.G. NELSON Circuit Judges. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Teodulo Hernandez-Alvarado appeals his conviction and sentence, following jury trial, for conspiracy, distribution and possession with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1) and 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Hernandez-Alvarado's counsel filed a brief which identified two possible issues for review: (1) whether the district court abused its discretion by admitting allegedly inaccurate English transcripts of tape-recorded Spanish conversations between Hernandez-Alvarado, his co-conspirators and a confidential informant ("CI") into evidence; and (2) whether the…