United States v. Adolfo Estrada

967 F.2d 593 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Adolfo ESTRADA, Defendant/Appellant. No. 89-50502. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 11, 1992. * Decided June 15, 1992. Before JAMES R. BROWNING, ALDISERT ** and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 Adolfo Estrada appeals his conviction by conditional guilty plea for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). He contends that the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence because his warrantless arrest was not supported by probable cause. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo the district court's finding that probable cause supported the arrest. United States v. Klein, 860 F.2d 1489, 1492 (9th Cir.1988). We review underlying factual findings for clear error. Id. at 1492-93 . I. 4 The facts are undisputed. In…