United States v. Pedro Parra-Gonzalez

967 F.2d 594 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pedro PARRA-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50668. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 25, 1992. * Decided July 6, 1992. Before FLETCHER, LEAVY and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Pedro Parra-Gonzalez appeals from his sentence, imposed following a guilty plea, for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 . Parra-Gonzalez contends that the district court erred by adjusting his offense level under the United States Sentencing Guidelines (Guidelines) for possession of a firearm during the drug offense. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm. 3 We review for clear error the district court's factual finding that the defendant possessed a firearm during a narcotics offense. United States v. Garcia, 909 F.2d 1346, 1349 (9th Cir.1990). 4 The district…