United States v. Antonio Perez AKA Armondo Perez

967 F.2d 594 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio PEREZ aka Armondo Perez, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-10425. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 13, 1992. * Decided June 22, 1992. Before CHOY, HUG and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Appellant Antonio Perez appeals from the twenty-seven month sentence imposed after his guilty plea to one count of fraud and related activity in connection with an access device under 18 U.S.C. § 1029 (a)(2) and aiding and abetting under 18 U.S.C. § 2 . Perez contends that the district court erred when it increased his offense level by five levels under United States Sentencing Guideline § 2F1.1(b)(1)(F) 1 and urges that the proper adjustment is three levels. Finding Perez's contentions without merit, we affirm the district court's sentence. 3 On March 26, 1991 Daisy E. Salgado was arrested after attempting to obtain a $500 cash…