United States v. Daniel Enyinnaya Ogidi

Good Law
967 F.2d 594·1992 WL 124417·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 24609
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 9, 199291-30243California1,646 words

Opinion

Opinion

967 F.2d 594 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel Enyinnaya OGIDI, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-30243. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 5, 1992. * Decided June 9, 1992. Before EUGENE A. WRIGHT, CANBY and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Ogidi appeals his convictions for importation of heroin, conspiracy to import heroin, smuggling, possession with intent to distribute and making a false statement. We affirm. 3 * In October 1990, Ogidi and Dianne Jones arrived at the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport on a flight from Singapore. After they left the plane, both were questioned separately about the trip. During the customs inspection, Ogidi was asked whether he was traveling alone. He answered affirmatively and said he met Jones on the flight. The Customs official found pictures of Ogidi and Jones together in Ogidi's luggage 4 Another Customs official questioned Jones.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.