United States v. Jack Lande

967 F.2d 594 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jack LANDE, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 91-30185, 91-30186. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 8, 1992. * Decided June 30, 1992. Before JAMES R. BROWNING, EUGENE A. WRIGHT and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Lande appeals the denial of his motion to dismiss the indictments on the ground of outrageous government misconduct. We affirm. 3 In Young v. United States, 481 U.S. 787 (1987), an interested private party was appointed to act as a prosecutor. In this case, the prosecution was at all times under the control of the government. General Instruments was asked to aid the government by providing technical expertise. It was not given control over the prosecution. 4 Lande does not point to any prejudice he suffered from the involvement of General Instruments in the investigation. Many investigations are begun in response to a…