United States v. Kuldip Singh Mundi

967 F.2d 594 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kuldip Singh MUNDI, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-10196. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 10, 1992. * Decided June 12, 1992. Before FLETCHER, LEAVY and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Kuldip Sing Mundi appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to correct his criminal sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 . We review de novo, United States v. Angelone, 894 F.2d 1129, 1130 (9th Cir.1990), and we affirm. 3 In this pre-United States Sentencing Guidelines case, Mundi was convicted after a jury trial on twenty-five counts of wire fraud (counts 1-25) in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 1343, and one count of conspiracy (count 27) in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 . Mundi was sentenced to concurrent five-year terms of imprisonment for each of counts 1 through 25 and…