United States v. Richard Lloyd Logsdon

967 F.2d 594 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Lloyd LOGSDON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-30287. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 5, 1992. * Decided June 9, 1992. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing July 22, 1992. Before EUGENE A. WRIGHT, CANBY and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 * In light of our recent decision in United States v. Mason, No. 89-30156, slip op. 4403 (April 23, 1992), we find no error in the district court's consideration of Logsdon's conduct outside Washington. 3 Although the bounds of Logsdon's agreement regarding the Rule 11 hearing are unclear, we give him the benefit of the doubt by construing it as a fact stipulation. We assume that the government agreed to limit its recitation of the facts to Logsdon's conduct in Washington. Even so, we find no error in the court's decision to look beyond this incomplete description of Logsdon's crime. 4 In…