United States v. Joseph Jay Pickrel, United States of America v. James Pickrel, United States of America v. Marven Ellis Broxson, United States of America v. Danny Lee Endicott

967 F.2d 595 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph Jay PICKREL, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James PICKREL, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marven Ellis BROXSON, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Danny Lee ENDICOTT, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 91-30062, 91-30064, 91-30304 and 91-30066. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 6, 1992. * Decided June 2, 1992. Before CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, O'SCANNLAIN and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Joseph Pickrel, James Pickrel, Marven Broxson, and Danny Endicott were arrested and charged with various crimes relating to the manufacture, possession, and distribution of methamphetamine. In exchange for the government's promise to recommend leniency at sentencing, Endicott agreed to testify against his coconspirators and…