United States v. Roxanne Lynn Reynolds, AKA Roxie
Opinion
Opinion
967 F.2d 595 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roxanne Lynn REYNOLDS, aka Roxie, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-30339. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 3, 1992. Decided June 25, 1992. Before EUGENE A. WRIGHT, CANBY and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Roxanne Lynn Reynolds appeals her conviction for conspiracy and aiding and abetting the distribution of methamphetamines, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1), 21 U.S.C. § 846 , and 18 U.S.C. § 2 . We affirm. DISCUSSION A. Evidence of Prior Conviction 3 Reynolds contends that the district judge abused his discretion by admitting evidence of her prior conviction for possession of drug paraphernalia. This contention lacks merit. The record reflects that the evidence only came in when Officer Green responded to a defense question on cross-examination. Because the defense invited any error, it cannot…