United States v. Guillermo Alfonso Salazar

967 F.2d 595 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Guillermo Alfonso SALAZAR, Defendant-Appellant. No. 89-50328. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 10, 1992. * Decided June 4, 1992. Before KILKENNY, GOODWIN and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Guillermo Alfonso Salazar appeals his conviction, following a jury trial, for conspiracy and possession with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1). Salazar contends that his conviction should be reversed because evidence was improperly admitted against him and he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. We affirm. 3 The failure to move for a timely suppression of evidence waives any objections to its admission. Fed.R.Crim.P. 12. See United States v. Gonzales, 749 F.2d 1329, 1336 (9th Cir.1984). Although Fed.R.Crim.P. 12 allows the district court to grant relief from the waiver for…