United States v. Julio Cesar Segovia-Sanchez

967 F.2d 595 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julio Cesar SEGOVIA-SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-30248. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 6, 1992. Decided June 19, 1992. 1 Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN, Circuit Judge, and CROCKER, * District Judge. MEMORANDUM 2 Segovia-Sanchez (Segovia) appeals his sentence for drug-related crimes. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3231 and 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review the district court's legal interpretation of the Sentencing Guidelines de novo, and its factual determinations for clear error. United States v. Wilson, 900 F.2d 1350, 1355 (9th Cir.1990). We affirm. 3 Segovia argues that the district court erred by including amounts of drugs seized on February 8 and 9, 1990, in his base offense level as…