United States v. Property Titled in the Names of Mario B. Manglicmot and Milagros C. Manglicmot

967 F.2d 595 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PROPERTY TITLED IN THE NAMES OF Mario B. MANGLICMOT and Milagros C. Manglicmot, Defendant-Appellants. No. 91-15361. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 12, 1992. * Decided June 3, 1992. 1 Before FARRIS and RYMER, Circuit Judges, and KENYON, District Judge ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Claimants Mario B. Manglicmot and Milagros C. Manglicmot appeal the denial of their motion to set aside default judgment and decree of forfeiture. They argue that the district court erred in its finding that claimants failed to present any meritorious defense to the forfeiture action brought by the United States. We disagree and affirm. 4 The Manglicmots challenge the denial of their motion on three grounds. First, they argue that the district court erred in finding that Mrs. Manglicmot failed to allege sufficient facts to raise a meritorious defense of innocent…