United States v. Dennis See

967 F.2d 595 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dennis SEE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-10626. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 14, 1992. Decided June 1, 1992. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Dennis See appeals from the district court's denial of his motion for a new trial following his conviction for conspiring to possess with the intent to distribute cocaine ( 21 U.S.C. § 846 ) and possessing a handgun during the course of the conspiracy ( 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 , 924(c)). See argues that he should have been granted a new trial because (1) he was denied effective assistance of counsel as the result of his trial lawyer's failure to call See's wife as a defense witness, (2) unfairly prejudicial evidence of See's other bad acts was introduced at trial, and (3) the district judge improperly interrogated See on cross-examination.…