United States v. Michael Pollock

Good Law
967 F.2d 595·1992 WL 137176·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 24688
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 17, 199291-15620California617 words

Opinion

Opinion

967 F.2d 595 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael POLLOCK, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-15620. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 11, 1992. * Decided June 17, 1992. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and BEEZER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Michael Lawrence Pollock appeals from the final judgment of the district court denying his motion for correction of sentence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm. 3 * Michael Pollock was convicted on thirty-seven separate counts of narcotics and firearms violations arising from a seventy-three count indictment. On February 3, 1983, the district court sentenced Pollock to consecutive five year terms on counts 1, 21, 22 and 23, and a consecutive two year term on count 24. Pollock further received five year terms on counts 25-29, 31-45, 49, 56-59 and 62-67, and a two year term on count 73. The sentence on each of those…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.