United States v. Jose De Jesus Ruiz-Granillo

967 F.2d 595 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose De Jesus RUIZ-GRANILLO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50609. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 5, 1992. Decided June 18, 1992. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and BRUNETTI and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM 1 Ruiz-Granillo appeals his conviction on charges of importing marijuana and of possessing marijuana with intent to distribute. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3231 . We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm. 2 Ruiz-Granillo first argues that the district judge abused his discretion in excluding the proposed expert testimony on eyewitness identification. Ruiz-Granillo failed to make an offer of proof outlining the proposed testimony. Ruiz-Granillo asserts that "the defendant was not even allowed to make an offer of proof." The record,…