United States v. Rodney Ray Wagner

967 F.2d 596 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodney Ray WAGNER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-30018. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 26, 1992. * Decided June 1, 1992. Before FARRIS, DAVID R. THOMPSON and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Rodney Ray Wagner appeals from his sentence, imposed following a guilty plea, for armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2113 (a) and (d) and use of a firearm during a felony in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c). Wagner contends that the district court erred by failing to adjust his offense level downward for acceptance of responsibility under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm. 3 We review de novo the district court's application of the Sentencing Guidelines. United States v. Hall, 952 F.2d 1170, 1172 (9th Cir.1991). The district court's decision…