United States v. Glen E. Weiland

967 F.2d 596 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Glen E. WEILAND, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-35943. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 10, 1992. * Decided June 17, 1992. Before FLETCHER, LEAVY and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Glen E. Weiland appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. Weiland contends that the district court's failure to advise him of a mandatory special parole term when he entered his guilty plea constituted reversible error. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we review de novo the legality of a criminal sentence. Rodriguera v. United States, 954 F.2d 1465, 1467 (9th Cir.1992). We vacate the district court's judgment and remand to allow Weiland to plead anew. 3 * FACTS & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 4 On December 1, 1986, Weiland pleaded guilty to one…