United States v. Brett Allan Zimmerman

Good Law
967 F.2d 596·1992 WL 127040·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 24584
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 11, 199291-30218California981 words

Opinion

Opinion

967 F.2d 596 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brett Allan ZIMMERMAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-30218. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 7, 1992. * Decided June 11, 1992. 1 Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN, Circuit Judge, and LEVI, District Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Appellant Brett Allen Zimmerman challenges the denial of a discovery request and the refusal to reduce his offense level because he was a minor participant. We affirm the district court. 4 I. Denial of Discovery Request. 5 Zimmerman's primary contention on appeal is that the district court erred in denying his discovery request for information regarding internal policies related to drug prosecutions and prosecution of other defendants charged with similar crimes. 1 He asserts that, in the absence of this information, he was unable to show that the government violated his due process rights. Zimmerman relies…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.