United States v. Glenn E. Willmschen

Good Law
967 F.2d 596·1992 WL 122240·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 24577
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 3, 199290-30146California1,488 words

Opinion

Opinion

967 F.2d 596 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Glenn E. WILLMSCHEN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-30146. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 26, 1992. * Decided June 3, 1992. Before FARRIS, DAVID R. THOMPSON and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Glenn E. Willmschen appeals his conviction, following a jury trial, for three counts of tax evasion, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7201 . Willmschen contends that the district court erred by denying his motion for a continuance of trial without an adequate hearing, thereby depriving him of his sixth amendment right to counsel. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Willmschen was indicted on March 1, 1989. When he appeared without counsel for arraignment on April 17, 1989, the magistrate judge rescheduled the arraignment for April 20 and ordered him to appear with counsel. When he again appeared without…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.